I don’t cheer for
the home team. I haven’t for a long time. When I was a boy I rooted for the
teams I was expected to – the Packers – Green and Gold gods to be bowed down
to. But something turned for me – it all seemed so arbitrary, so without
thought. You happen to be born in a certain place, to a particular set of
people and because of that happenstance you are a member of the tribe. The
tribe that says we are the best, we are the chosen.
The logic of it
embarrassed me. Really?, I wanted to
ask. Really? What if you had been born
one hundred miles away? The more I thought about it the crazier it seemed. I wanted to meet the other team. Then another
and another.
Some – or most –
of any tribe are needed to root for the home team. Without them, I think
stadiums would be empty as importing loyalty is harder than growing your own.
Call us brainwashed robots or not, this mindless adherence might seem arbitrary
but it is necessary to preserve culture and customs. But then we have to decide
what is really worth preserving and why we are afraid of change.
Do we
need stadiums? Do we need the Bread and Circuses? But you
hit the right spot – what is
worth preserving. It seems it is often the wrong things – the superficial
things that get preserved until a culture becomes a thin shell of its
former self.
Recently I had a
discussion with a friend about being attracted to what my friend D calls “the
other”. It’s been, if not an issue then
a theme, a thread I’ve tugged at trying to understand. I thought that perhaps my friend S could help
me. I’m white – she’s, of course, not. Except I’ve come to the conclusion that
it really doesn’t have much to do with appearance but more with character –
more with the heart, one that hasn’t been completely blinded by the chance of culture.
I don’t have that
much of an insight on why some seek out the other. I’ve imagined it’s a desire
for life to be a little more complicated, stepping away from cookie cutters and
boxes and all those clichés we feel trapped in everyday. Perhaps it’s a desire
to control your own destiny. I do understand why we don’t seek out the other.
When the world is spinning - a collision of culture, language, morals, even
color - you have to hold on to something. Is there anything wrong with that?
Except it’s mostly a losing battle.
Yes,
Sideways, I think that is right – but I would substitute rich for complicated. I
am currently writing a story where one character tells another that believing
we are holding onto something is simply how we get through the day.
I have had strong
friendships with Spanish men, Native Americans, Asians, but really it’s been
women. They have let me in easily and deeply. With men there are other
obstacles – power maybe. Maybe I try harder with women. Maybe I am more myself
with women.
Don’t women only
give half the story?
No, they are at least 75% of the story.
Or maybe I wanted
to prove something to myself and to them. Prove that if you open the heart the
rest of it comes along. It doesn’t matter if the heart is from Argentina or
Iran or Vietnam or India, or even the high Hopi mesas of northern Arizona. If
you stay open to the hum, it can come from anywhere. Be grateful when it does.